More dogs die as poisonous jerky treats remain on store shelves
With each passing day that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is unable to determine the contaminate responsible for poisoning dogs in chicken jerky treats, dogs continue to die, while the deadly treats remain on store shelves. As long as the FDA allows it, retailers will continue to sell it and manufacturers will continue to produce it.
The events regarding the poisonous chicken jerky, which has been under FDA scrutiny for the past five years without a resolution, has led consumers to be increasingly cautious and mistrustful of the Federal government’s commitment or ability to protect them or their pets from harm and of the assurance that the products they buy will be safe.
A mountain of evidence
Mounting evidence of serious illness and death associated with the products has veterinarians and pet parents increasingly ill at ease. Determining the toxin responsible for the deaths presents a problem that has pet parents across the country in an uproar: the manufacturers of the treats will not pull the product from the shelves until the FDA demands that they do, which the FDA cannot do until they have conclusive proof that the products are in violation of the law. Meanwhile, the FDA continues extensive chemical and microbial testing but has not identified a contaminant. Until such time, all the FDA can do is caution consumers; which, to most pet parents does not seem fair or adequate, ethical or moral.
Another day, another death
Each day the product remains on the market brings another tragedy and devastation to one more family whose dogs are poisoned by chicken jerky treats. Grief stricken pet parents write me, pleading with me to help get the word out to consumers. Confused, they ask me why has the FDA allowed a product the FDA itself has acknowledged to be dangerous remain on the market? They ask me what good are warnings posted on the FDA website when the product can still be purchased in the largest retailer in the world, Wal-Mart? Why, they ask, doesn’t the FDA take a proactive stance and recall the products first and discover what the contaminate is later?
I wish I had a reasonable answer, one that would be acceptable or understandable to a grief-stricken family. But there are none, none that would make sense to a pet parent who has just buried their dog.
A broad perspective
To understand the problem from a broad perspective one must first understand the fundamental basis from which the FDA operates under, the Federal, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) the Federal laws affording protection to humans and animals from dangerous and unsafe products. The FDA is in charge of enforcing the FFDCA and the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) is the branch within the FDA that is specifically responsible for making sure that foods for animals are safe.
The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) that states in part:
The use of food products is governed by the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), and the regulations issued under its authority. These regulations are published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The FFDCA defines food as “articles used for food or drink for man or other animals…” Therefore, any article that is intended to be used as an animal feed ingredient, to become part of an ingredient or feed, or added to an animal’s drinking water is considered a “food” and thus, is subject to regulation. FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) is responsible for the regulation of human food products. CVM is responsible for the regulation of animal food (feed) products.
The FFDCA sets forth requirements for “foods” in the Sections 402 and 403. Failure to meet these requirements can result in a product being deemed adulterated or misbranded. Adulteration includes, among other things, food packaged or held under unsanitary conditions, food or ingredients that are filthy or decomposed, and food that contains any poisonous or deleterious substance. A food may be considered misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any way or fails to include required information.
As early as 2007
The FDA has been aware of food-related nephrotoxicity in dogs associated with the consumption of chicken jerky treats from China as early as 2007, perhaps even earlier. Ingestion of these treats lead to a form of acquired Fanconi syndrome, including glucosuria with normaglycemia, aminoaciduria, cilindiuria, hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis, and frequently azotemia. Gastrointestinal signs (vomiting and anorexia), and elevated liver enzymes along with a number other clinical signs has veterinarians deeply concerned.
It would be a mistake for anyone to assume that in the absence of a definitive toxin that the illnesses these dogs have faced are due to some cause other reason than the consumption of the treats. Extensive diagnostic testing eliminated other causes of the observed clinical signs, such as urinary tract infection and rickettsial disease. Glucosuria in the face of euglycemia or hypoglycemia, aminoaciduria, and metabolic acidosis confirmed the diagnosis of Fanconi syndrome. Based on the histories obtained, the chicken jerky treats were a part of the diet and were consumed daily by all dogs has led researchers to conclude a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of the treats with disease.
The usual suspects
A well-known microbiologist in the food safety sector, Phyllis Entis of eFoodAlert.com wrote to me after one of my particularly scathing condemnations of the FDA; she helped me understand the problem the FDA has faced in discovering what the specific contaminate is: they have to know what to look for before they can test for it.
The FDA, in addition to several animal health diagnostic laboratories in the U.S., has been working to determine why these products are associated with illness in dogs. To date, scientists have not been able to determine a definitive cause for the reported illnesses. Despite extensive chemical and microbiological testing, the FDA has not identified a specific contaminant — or a specific brand or type of treat. Thus far all the likely contaminates have tested negative and been eliminated from their inquiry.
Infinitesimal possibilities
What remains are thousands upon thousands of unknown contaminates. Further complicating the problem is the yearly introduction of thousands of new chemicals on the market. As well as any chemical that is no longer legally allowed for use in this country may be still in use in another country. And who can ignore the remarkable creativity the Chinese display in using novel contaminates with an alarming frequency. And finally, add to this equation the infinitesimal number of combinations thereof and you have a recipe to drive any scientist to drink.
A mother’s patience
Despite the problems facing the FDA scientists, it seems inconceivable that if this were a problem with human food, that the FDA would allow it to remain on the market until such time they discover the toxin while humans continued to get sick and die. It may be unconscionable to do so, yet it is perfectly legal under Federal law to allow a deadly treat for pets to remain on the market until such time the reason for it’s toxicity is known.
I have to wonder then, does the FDA expect consumers to find it acceptable that dogs should continue to be poisoned because they have been unable to determine the contaminate? Does the FDA anticipate that consumers have an inexhaustible patience while testing continues indefinitely while the product remains on the market? Are consumers expected to be understanding of the difficulty the FDA faces while bury their dogs?
I will ask the same questions this time exchanging the word dog for child: Would the FDA expect mothers to be patient and understanding while they bury their child? Would the parents of a child that died as a result of consuming a contaminated product accept that until the FDA could determine what the contaminate was that other parents may face the same horror? Would the FDA advise parents to observe their child for symptoms of acute renal failure should they “choose to continue” feeding the contaminated product?
A double standard
Think back, just a few weeks ago when it was reported that an infant died from a rare bacterial infection formerly associated with a contaminated infant formula. Before the ink was even dry on the press release, and before it was even known if it was the formula that caused the death of that one precious infant – the product was yanked off the shelves so fast by retailers it made your head spin. They didn’t wait for the FDA to issue a recall. It vanished from the market in less than one day.
Hospitals across the country issued the same warning about a possible contaminated formula and it was not fed to any infants until they knew it was safe.
I don’t mean to suggest that infants are undeserving of such cautious measures, or that pets are deserving of more attention than children, quite the opposite. I applaud the retailers, the manufacturer and the medical facilities for their prompt action in a proactive manner preventing what might have been further deaths. Mercifully, it turns out there was nothing wrong with the formula after all.
Is a safety of your dog’s food any less important than your children’s food? Not to any of the pet parents I have spoken with. Federal law does not make the distinction between the safety of food for your child or your dog, why then do retailers and manufacturers?
Shoot first, ask questions later
The world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart, didn’t wait for anyone to tell them to do the right thing when they pulled the Enfamil baby formula off their shelves after an infant died. Other retailers followed suit, they withdrew the formula while “awaiting further clarity from the manufacturer and FDA”. Another retailer pulled the formula “out of an abundance of caution”. It was a shoot-first, ask questions later moment for retailers as well as consumers. The headline was scary enough to cause consumers to change their purchase patterns in the near-term, and no one knew how long that would last even if it was unjustified.
Watch closely
Consumers who have fed their dogs chicken jerky products should watch for their dogs closely for any of the following signs that may occur within hours to days of feeding the products:
- sluggishness or lethargy combined with a reluctance to eat in general;
- decreased appetite, although some dogs may continue to eat the treats instead of other foods;
- vomiting;
- diarrhea, sometimes with blood;
- increased water consumption;
- increased urination, sometimes with blood;
- yellowish tint (jaundice) to the eyes or gums
- lift up your animals ear and look for a reddish rash or on the belly area as well
If the dog shows any of these signs, pet parents should consult their veterinarian immediately. Blood tests may indicate kidney failure (increased urea nitrogen and creatinine). Urine tests may indicate Fanconi syndrome (increased glucose). The problem can be confused with diabetes.
What’s a Fanconi?
This is an uncommon condition. It affects the kidneys and causes them to leak glucose (sugar) and other electrolytes into the urine. Dogs that have this condition will usually be very thirsty and will urinate excessive amounts. The most common finding in laboratory tests is that the dog has glucose in the urine, but has a normal blood glucose level.
Some dogs can be born with Fanconi syndrome. But, the latest concern is that there is something in chicken jerky strips that is actually causing some dogs to develop this problem. Some dogs can get very sick and even go into renal failure and die. Other dogs will have an increase in thirst and urination and possibly have accidents in the house and then they may go on to have a full recovery within a few weeks of stopping the chicken jerky treats.
What if you think your dog has Fanconi syndrome?
If your dog is drinking and urinating more and he or she has eaten chicken treats, then it goes without saying that you should stop giving those treats. The next step is to have your vet examine your dog and do some blood and urine tests. These tests will quickly tell us whether the dog has Fanconi syndrome or whether there is another problem such as diabetes, Cushing’s or kidney disease. If there is Fanconi syndrome the vet will tell you whether it looks like there is damage to the kidneys. If so, they may need to give intravenous fluids for a few days. If there is no damage then your dog will likely recover over the next few weeks.
What should you do if your dog has been a victim?
- Read this informative article on How to report a problem with a pet food.
- Read the Pet Food Safety Reporting Frequently Asked Questions
- You and your veterinarian should report complaints about a pet food product electronically through the Department of Health and Human Service’s Safety Reporting Portal
- You and your veterinarian should call your state’s FDA Consumer Complaint Coordinators
- Consumers should report illnesses to the FDA’s Pet Food Complaint Site
- Ask Wal-Mart to remove chicken jerky treats (all brands) manufactured in China from their stores 1-800-Walmart (1-800-925-6278) or contact Wal-Mart’s their corporate offices online
- Call PetSmart and ask them why they are still selling Waggin Train by Nestle Purina treats and other chicken treats at 800-738-1385 or contact PetSmart’s corporate offices online
- Call Petco and ask them the same question 888-824-7257 or contact Petco online
- Make a complaint to Consumer Affairs: Consumer complaints about Waggin Train Treats
- Make a complaint to Nestle Purina Pet Care the manufacturer of Waggin Train here
- Sign the petition to Ban all poisonous chicken jerky treats imported from China
- Contact the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF)
- If you live in the state of Texas you might want to contact an attorney and file a class action lawsuit. Why Texas? Because a landmark court decision in that state allows people for the first time to seek “sentimental value” damages for the loss of their pets.
- Consider a class action: Plaintiff Power Not Dead Yet: Consumer Class Actions Roll On Despite Congressional Assault
Be prepared in the event of a class action lawsuit
Contemplate carefully whether to accept an offer of compensation from the manufacturer, you may consider the possibility of joining a class action lawsuit at some point in the future. In which case, I would advise you to take these precautions in preparation of such an event (I am not an attorney, so the following list of suggestions is by no means comprehensive):
- Keep your package of the treats and any contents, and do not send the package to the manufacturer “for a refund”;
- Document your communications with the FDA, CVM and the manufacturer along with whom you spoke to and on what dates;
- Take pictures and/or video tape any relevant information, date them;
- Ask for written statements from your vet, the labs, hospitals, clinics;
- Document related expenses: time taken off work, time and cost of traveling to and from appointments, for example;
- Get copies of all of your pet’s medical records, lab results and invoices of medical procedures;
- Finally, scrutinize all documents for errors or omissions and ask for corrections if you find anything that is incorrect or unclear
Sentimental value
In the state of Texas a landmark case was won that supports recovery for the loss of their pet for sentimental value damages. This sweeping change in animal law gives pet parents the potential for damages recovery for the loss of their pets that is available for the loss of a relative or close human friend.
In a groundbreaking court ruling in November, the 2nd Court of Appeals in Fort Worth ruled that a pet’s value is greater than its price tag. The court overruled a 120-year-old case in which the Texas Supreme Court ruled that pet owners could recover only the market value of their pets.
“Dogs are unconditionally devoted to their owners,” according to the ruling. “We interpret timeworn Supreme Court law … to acknowledge that the special value of ‘man’s best friend’ should be protected.“
The attorney that represented the pet parents was, my hero, Randy Turner of Turner & McKenzie of Fort Worth Texas.
A final word…of caution
The press has emphasised to avoid treats made in China, which while wise advice is by no means comprehensive. What the press fail to mention is the law concerning Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) does not apply to pet food or treats, nor does it apply to dried foods or processed foods of any kind. Even with foods that are covered without going into elaborate detail, essentially the law states that if the product (ingredient) imported is changed in some manner once inside the United States, it is no longer, by legal definition, a product of the originating country from which it came from.
Thus, by law the label can say “Made in the USA”. So, do not make the assumption that if the package is printed with the assurance the product was “Made in the USA”, when in fact it did not originate in the United States. Simply put – do not buy any jerky treats (tenders, strips, nibbles, num nums, what-evers) until this whole mess is sorted.
Jerky treats in the news
FDA warns of possible dangers with chicken jerky dog treats Jan 27, 2012
FDA warns pet parents about jerky treats made in China Jan 26, 2012
Sickening: Are wholesome Waggin Train treats hurting pets? Jan 22, 2012 Updated: Jan 23, 2012
In Your Corner: FDA Warnings On Pet Treats Jan 20, 2012
Manufacturer of possibly deadly dog treat speaks Jan 19, 2012 Updated: Jan 20, 2012
Dog owners cautioned about chicken jerky treats Jan 19, 2012
FDA cautions dog owners of treats Jan 18, 2012
Humane Society warns about dog treats made in China Jan 13, 2012
FDA warns chicken jerky dog treats associated with illness Jan 3, 2012
Warning about chicken-jerky treats for dogs Dec 30, 2011
Family says dog died after eating treats made in China Dec 29, 2011
Chicken Jerky from China may be causing Fanconi syndrome in dogs Updated: Dec 29, 2011
Chicken jerky treats sicken 353 dogs, owners report Dec 28, 2011
Pet treat alert Nov 23, 2011
Related articles
Update: Thaxton family nightmare after dogs poisoned by jerky treats continues (poisonedpets.com)
A grieving family wants chicken jerky dog treats to be taken off the market. (poisonedpets.com)
FDA Still Baffled Why Pet Treats from China are Poisoning Dogs…Again (poisonedpets.com)
Pet Food Expert Petitions the Government to Stop the FDA from Violating Federal Law. (poisonedpets.com)
FDA gives pet food loophole to by-pass the law (TruthAboutPetFood)
Caution to Dog Owners About Chicken Jerky Products (FDA, December 13, 2011)
Special note: Up next a personal story of how the deadly treats affected one family and their beloved dog, Sarge. And thanks to the person who put together the YouTube video.
Pet Food Safety News publishes reader-supported investigative reporting on commercial pet food, industry practices, and regulatory issues affecting consumers. It has no financial ties to pet food companies. Donations help fund the research, writing, and publishing costs behind this work and support continued reporting on transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the pet food industry. If you value this reporting, please consider making a donation.
Discover more from Pet Food Safety News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
35 Comments
Tina Hull
Mollie: This is the reply I received from Purina regarding my situation. It does make sense if owners are feeding their dogs more than is recommended. But, I, for one, will not be feeding my dogs anything I find is made in China.
Thank you for contacting Nestlé Purina PetCare Company.
We appreciate you contacting us, and expressing your feelings regarding Waggin’ Train(r) Treats for Dogs. Please know that they are important to us. We would like to assure you that your comments will be noted, and reported to the appropriate individuals in our company. We feel certain that careful consideration will be given to them and any others we might receive.
On September 17, 2010, Nestlé Purina PetCare Company acquired Waggin’ Train(r) LLC. Waggin’ Train(r) LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nestlé Purina and as such, operates as a separate company. On occasion, we will insert a sample of a new product into our existing products, as a way of introducing households.
Thank you for contacting Waggin’ Train(r).
We appreciate the opportunity to address your questions and your concerns. On November 18, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an update about chicken jerky treats for dogs. Consistent with their prior 2007 and 2008 statements, the FDA has been unable to determine a definitive cause of reported dog illnesses or a direct link to chicken jerky products. To date, extensive chemical and microbial testing performed by the FDA has not uncovered a contaminant or cause of illness from any chicken jerky treat, including Waggin’ Train treats.
The FDA continues to advise dog owners that chicken jerky products should not be substituted for a balanced diet, and are intended to be fed occasionally in small quantities. The FDA has previously reported that any association between dog illnesses and chicken jerky may be the result of dogs (primarily small dogs) consuming treats in excess of normal or recommended levels. Consumers are encouraged to read and follow the feeding guidelines found on Waggin’ Train packages.
Waggin’ Train has a comprehensive food safety program in place to ensure the safety of our products. We only use high-quality ingredients in our products, and the production facilities are designed and operated to meet U.S. Department of Agriculture standards. We have a dedicated team of quality control experts in China – particularly, in the plants when Waggin’ Train products are being produced. They monitor various steps of the manufacturing process for safety and quality of the product.
The safety and quality of our products are our top priorities. Our consumers can & should continue to feed our treats with complete confidence.
We hope you find this information helpful.
Again, thank you for visiting our website.
Mollie Morrissette
Wow. Typical customer relations from beginning to end. Thanks for sharing this letter with us. It’s good to know we have robots taking care of our needs.
Tina
I don’t remember how I came upon this information but am so thankful. I read it yesterday and today I opened a new bag of dog food. You guessed it, inside was a free package of chicken jerky treats “made in China.” I will be posting this to everyone I know who has dogs and will be writing a letter to the dog food company asking they remove these treats. God bless you for sharing and my sincere condolences to those whose pets have suffered and passed due to this terrible but correctable problem. The FDA should be ashamed.
Mollie Morrissette
Tina, you are the reason I do this work. Stories like yours give me immeasurable joy in knowing that maybe, just maybe, I made a difference in a dogs life. And through your passion and help, perhaps in the lives of many other precious pooches! Thanks for spreadin’ the word!
You know, I call myself (now, don’t think I’m nuts…er….crazy) the Crazy Cat Lady on a Mission from God. Tee hee.
Blessings,
Mollie
Kathy
Contaminate= verb. The noun you mean is contaminant.
Mollie Morrissette
Bless you, my spell checker. My brains are running on fumes from lack of sleep. Thank you Kathy. I’ll fix my boo boo. What a no-brainer.
Jen
I currently have Milo’s Kitchen chicken Jerky…I noticed they are made in China. Is this one that has made the list? I don’t want to give my dog anymore if there is a problem.
Mollie Morrissette
Oh, yes. Throw it away! Stay tuned, I’m in the middle of another post! Mollie
Melissa
Oh my GOSH!!! I just picked up a bag of these today, for the first time EVER, at Sam’s Club. I read the ingredients, checked where the company is, (SC) and completely MISSED the “Made in China” on the opposite side of the bag!!! If I’d seen the “Made in China” I wouldn’t have bought them anyway, but sheesh, I thought they were an American MADE product and the ingredients seemed wholesome and healthy. I’ll be returning them tomorrow. Thank you SO MUCH for this article!!! I have six dogs of my own, plus I’m fostering a mama and her six two-week-old puppies and everyone (except the puppies of course) would have gotten these tonight!!!
Mollie Morrissette
Well, just thank the good Lord you have me. I’m kidding of course. On the other hand, it never hurts to pray.
I am so pleased your babies were saved from a possible poisoning!!! What a miracle!!
Don’t forget – at the bottom of the (very, very lengthy) article I go into the reason why you might not want to trust the products “Made in the USA”, at least until it is discovered why they are making pets so sick.
Bless you for being a foster, too! I’ve done that with orphaned kittens, and I can tell you it is the closest thing I’ll ever get to feeling like a real Mom – in a good way. Not the haggard, “get outta my hair right this minute or I’ll scream” Mom. Or the “I drink Martinis for breakfast or I’d go crazy” Mom.
Debbie
This has unacceptable overtones and a dark disturbing presence..yet another example of how ineffective and corrupt our government has become. Do not trust anyone with the health of your loved ones animal or human
Crystalblueice
OMG , after watching and reading that heartbreaking video, i am stunned. My dog is a yorkshire terrrier and she inhales these things she loves them so much. I have also a larger hybrid wolf, who loves them.. Like i said i have been buying the chicken and duck ones for like three years. After reading what i just did and watching that video,,,, i will not buy them anymore. Why dont they recall them. So many beautiful innocent dogs lost….. i would be devistated. So glad i came across this. I will repost this on facebook, as a lot of times the store is even sold out on these. This is just terrible, those beautiful dogs lost over treats. I can’t thank you enough for the information, you made me a believer. I cant believe they just finished a big bag of these last nite. I hope they stay safe, It said immediate reaction to these after consuming them? Or is it longer.? They are fine today. But these need to be gone, and they are so super expensive… why havent they been pulled like the dog food was. I feel so awful for the dogs and the ones that loved them. Like i said i would have no clue it would be these that would make my dog sick or even die. This is no joke. I do see on the bag in tiny letters on back, made in China. This is beyond awful. Thank you again for the information.
Crystalblueice
I must have or am lucky. My dogs love these and will eat no other brand . Twelve bucks for the big bag and its gone in a week. They go nuts when they hear the bag. Chicken and the duck one. Every store around here sells them. Never heard Waggin Tails was not good, when i read the story it mentioned other names. Never did i see Waggin Tails , been buying them for two years. Hummm Walmart has hundreds of these in different varieities all under Waggin Tail name. Scarey. They finished the last of the big bag i had last nite. They never had a reaction to them, except they love them. Will have to read more about this.
Mollie Morrissette
Hate to break it to you, but the duck ones have been implicated as well.
And just because your dogs didn’t drop over dead on the spot does not mean there is not the possibility of a lower level of the contaminate at work or the that the health of your dogs may be affected at some point in the near or distant future. There are so many thousands of lots, none of which have been adequately tested, therefore,we should not expect, or assume, that the “quality” or safety of that product to be consistent with any degree of certainty. In other words, buyer beware…
No one (all species) can expect to be exempt from the consequences of eating a diet that is toxic (by that, I mean unhealthy). It is simply unavoidable. It WILL catch up with us eventually.
Raven Thacker
thanks for the heads up , i will not buy them and i am going to share this so i can help out .
Margaret Story
Waggin Train is now producing treats wrapped in DUCK JERKY…is there any danger associated with this to our dogs???
Michelle North
Oh my gosh. My dog loves these so much. I just bought some a couple of days ago and have been giving them to her. What does it do to them? Please look me up on facebook michelle north (pogodzinsk) I feel so bad now. Should I have her checked out by our vet? Thank you so much
Mollie Morrissette
I’m assuming you mean Waggin’ Train? Read the know symptoms to watch out for and if you see any or all of them take her to the vet ASAP. Don’t feel bad – how could you have known? After all it’s still for sell in practically every store in America. Just keep a close eye on baby! Save your package and any leftover treats, just in case…
lettucehavewhirledpeas7
Walking down the aisles at Safeway, our local and 2nd largest grocery store chain in the US, I noticed the Waggin’ Train chicken jerky treats sitting on the shelf, looking as pretty as a picture, just waiting to be bought by an unsuspecting pet parent. What to do?… besides going berserk, trashing the shelves and having them cart me away…
I’m taking it to our local 3-county online bulletin board run by Yahoo Groups, and warning everyone who will read my rant. Until these jerky treats are found to have a toxin in them, and the FDA can take action, we need to spread the word. I hope everyone will take up the flag and spread the word, on Facebook, Twitter or whatever is your thing. I’m sure if we all rack our brains, we can come up with a variety of ways. Thankfully we have Mollie, who is burning the midnight oil, getting the word out to hundreds / thousands ? every day.
Mollie Morrissette
Aw, thanks Ma! I really do work my a** off. For ideas on how to rattle their cages follow any one of the steps outlined in the article. They aren’t hard – a phone call, an e-mail. They need to know customers are pissed off and won’t shop there any more until they do something. Are you listening Wal-Mart? Petco? PetSmart? Nestle Purina? FDA? CVM? I have links and phone numbers to those people and more!
Kaly White
Mollie you are a TRUE GENIOUS. I love reading you and you are living proof that no extra education is needed when you have such a gift. Thank you for using it for such a great cause!
I will definitely share. :-)
Mollie Morrissette
Now stop, you’re making me blush! But really you think I’m a – what? Was it….GENIUS? Let me repeat, you did mean you think I am a true GENIUS? As in fabulous, stupendous, stellar, brilliant, smart-as-a-whip, kick-butt, awesome, brainiac, no slouch, whipper-snapper, Mensa Club member, that kind of smart? Let me spell that out G E N I U S. Your check is in the mail too. How much did we agree on?
Pam
I am sending e-mails to those on the lists, Also I am warning everone I know about the poison that is called pet food.
Mollie Morrissette
Thanks Pam! What list do you refer to? I sure appreciate your help. I want this information to get out to as many people as possible. Not because I want to promote my blog but because I want to save dogs from being poisoned. There is important info about the Made in China warnings out in the media, that are misleading consumers – not all products will be labelled as such. As well as many, many steps victims can take to empower themselves with.
I make no money from doing this work. I do it because I love animals.
Thanks again Pam, you’re a doll!
Let me know if you are having problems with the links!
M.T. Lovejoy
Excellent journalism, Mollie! Thanks!
Mollie Morrissette
Golly thanks. I don’t know what the heck I’m doing most of the time, journalism wise – I almost didn’t graduate from high school I spent so much time cutting classes and farting around in art class (the only thing I was interested in at the time!). I know my grammar sucks, but I just do the best I can and think about the poor doggies and kitties instead of shaming myself for my lack of education. Glad you liked it.
Hey, are you able to click on the links? Some lady wrote and said none of them work. Still checking that out…they work on my end. Computers, eh? Sheesh!
M.T. Lovejoy (Moll)
The links work fine, Mollie… And,, please don’t belittle your writing abilities. With or without education, some people have the knack, some don’t. You, most definitely do….
Mollie Morrissette
Bless your cotton pickin’ heart! I love you too. Check’s in the mail…Glad to hear the links are working. Whew!
Jeannne Lehman
I was in Sam’s Club in Mishawaka, IN last night, 2-7-2011, and saw these treats on the shelves. I asked a man who was working in the area about them, told him that they were causing dogs to be poisoned, and should not be on the shelves. He told me, no way, if there was a problem, Sam’s would be right on it, they would know about it, and these are his best selling dog treats. Amazing! My daughter said that WalMart and PetSmart are also selling them!
Mollie Morrissette
It’s terrible, Jeanne. Everyone (petsumers) are so upset. We are all working hard to put a stop to it. Everyone reading this should write a letter to the corporate offices of the major retailers – they CAN do the right thing. Real letters are better than emails. I put the all the links in my article. Copy out the FDA Warning and ask store managers to post it. Sorry, but like the other retailers, Sam’s Club is putting PROFITS before PEOPLE and PETS! Tell them, “We’re not buying it”!
Jeannne Lehman
Great idea, I will pass it along to my dog lover friends!